Forums > Photography > Cameras and Related Equipment Suggestions
FahadUllah


Age: 36 Male
4741 days old here
Total Posts: 28

Location:
Karachi, Pakistan

Status : Offline
Subject : Cameras and Related Equipment Suggestions
Hey everyone.

Every now and then I get a lot of queries about which camera to buy, which equipment is better and what not. Although I'm not a very good photographer myself, I just have a love for gadgets and cameras are gadgets too so I read up on that a lot and survey electronic markets just for fun (I know I need to get a life but whatever )

Anyhoo, the reason for this topic is that if you are in market to buy a camera or stuff you can post your query here and I, along with VC and Momin would try to guide you people on what to buy and what not to buy.

Although with Momin and VC on board the discussion would go in favor of Nikon, but that's just an assumption. Let's see...

no likes.

Posted on July, 09 2012 03:35:54 AM


qwertypoiu


Age: 34 Male
4571 days old here
Total Posts: 926

Location:
lahore, Afghanistan

Status : Offline
117,000

no likes.

Posted on August, 23 2012 12:46:29 AM

VCheng


Age: 124 Male
4567 days old here
Total Posts: 712

Location:
New York, United States

Status : Offline
So how much is that in dollars? About 1200?

no likes.

Posted on August, 23 2012 12:55:48 AM

qwertypoiu


Age: 34 Male
4571 days old here
Total Posts: 926

Location:
lahore, Afghanistan

Status : Offline
last time i wanted to buy it, it was 125,000 now its 117,000 time will bring it down hope fully. yes it is bit over $1200 if you assume exchange rate at 95

no likes.

Posted on August, 24 2012 05:21:59 PM

VCheng


Age: 124 Male
4567 days old here
Total Posts: 712

Location:
New York, United States

Status : Offline
Once a newer model is announced, the D7000 should go for a good closeout price.

qwertypoiu like this.

Posted on August, 25 2012 06:50:31 AM

qwertypoiu


Age: 34 Male
4571 days old here
Total Posts: 926

Location:
lahore, Afghanistan

Status : Offline
But then why not one should buy the newer one :P

no likes.

Posted on August, 27 2012 01:04:15 AM

VCheng


Age: 124 Male
4567 days old here
Total Posts: 712

Location:
New York, United States

Status : Offline
One either pays the price for the latest, or gets better value. A D7000 at a closeout price would still take excellent pictures.

no likes.

Posted on August, 28 2012 02:26:54 AM

qwertypoiu


Age: 34 Male
4571 days old here
Total Posts: 926

Location:
lahore, Afghanistan

Status : Offline
18-300 lens is 99,000

no likes.

Posted on September, 08 2012 05:53:09 PM

AqeelBaig


Age: 60 Male
4741 days old here
Total Posts: 3576

Location:
Karachi, Pakistan

Status : Offline
Which one will u suggest
1. Canon EF 24-105mm F/4.0 L IS USM Lens
2. Canon EF L USM 28-70mm F/2.8 Lens



no likes.

Posted on September, 08 2012 06:57:13 PM

VCheng


Age: 124 Male
4567 days old here
Total Posts: 712

Location:
New York, United States

Status : Offline
#2 for sure, f2.8 is worth the slightly shorter zoom range.

no likes.

Posted on September, 08 2012 10:04:59 PM

AqeelBaig


Age: 60 Male
4741 days old here
Total Posts: 3576

Location:
Karachi, Pakistan

Status : Offline
VCheng said:

#2 for sure, f2.8 is worth the slightly shorter zoom range.


@Vcheng
I think #2 is no more in production.
It is replaced by Canon EF 24-70mm F/2.8 L USM Lens which is ~ 1900 $
while the above 2 type will cost $ 900 each.
I am looking for a used one & shall wait till Christmas to get a good deal.
What is ur opinion.

I know 2.8 is very tempting. I have both these in my gadget, the 70-200 & 24-75 which are Sigma & Tamron.
This Tamron is giving me problem & its aperture is malfunctioning.
But the 105 mm will give me more cushion if I compromise on low light situation.

no likes.

Posted on September, 09 2012 03:21:29 PM

Report Post